Top 5 Altcoins to Stake in 2025 (Medium–High Risk, High Rewards)

by | June 5, 2025 - 19:41

Staking cryptocurrencies can be a lucrative way to earn passive income, especially with altcoins that offer higher yields than the likes of Ethereum. However, higher staking rewards often come with increased risk and volatility, so they suit investors with a medium to high risk tolerance. Below we compare five of the top altcoins for staking in 2025 that balance attractive APYs with solid security, active development, growing ecosystems, and sufficient liquidity. We’ll delve into each coin’s staking rewards, mechanics, security/decentralization, lock-up rules, and ecosystem to understand why they stand out.

Quick Comparison: Staking Rewards & Key Metrics

The table below summarizes the staking appeal of our top 5 altcoins – Polkadot, Cosmos (ATOM), Avalanche (AVAX), Solana (SOL), and NEAR Protocol – in terms of annual rewards, risk level, lock-up period, and minimum stake required.

AltcoinEst. Staking APY (2025)Risk LevelLock-Up PeriodMin. Stake to Participate
Polkadot (DOT)~15%Medium28 days unbonding~1 DOT via pools (∼350 DOT for solo validator)
Cosmos (ATOM)~20–25%Medium21 days unbonding~1 ATOM (no fixed minimum for delegation)
Avalanche (AVAX)~7–10%Medium14–365 days (chosen by staker)25 AVAX to delegate (2000 AVAX to run validator)
Solana (SOL)~7%Medium-High~2 days (1 epoch)0.01 SOL (practical minimum to delegate)
NEAR Protocol (NEAR)~10%High~48 hours (~4 epochs)~1 NEAR (no minimum requirement for delegation)
Table: Overview of top staking altcoins in 2025 – annual percentage yield, risk assessment, lock-up/unbonding period, and minimum stake. Higher yields often imply higher risk (price volatility, inflation). Always research current rates and conditions, as network parameters can change.

Polkadot (DOT)

Polkadot is a layer-0 multichain platform that enables interoperability among specialized blockchains (parachains). Founded by Ethereum’s former CTO Gavin Wood, Polkadot aims to solve scalability and interoperability issues that Ethereum faces. Staking DOT is integral to its Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS) consensus, where nominators delegate to validators to secure the network. Despite offering a hefty ~15% annual reward, Polkadot is considered a medium-risk staking choice, given its strong development team and $7B+ market cap. Its staking system is robust, though fairly technical for running a node.

Polkadot staking highlights

DOT holders can stake through various methods – running a full validator node, nominating directly, or pooling in a nomination pool. Running a validator requires technical skill and reliable infrastructure, plus a stake higher than the lowest in the active set (around 350 DOT at last count). For most users, the easier route is to delegate via a nomination pool or wallet; Polkadot’s on-chain pools allow staking with as little as 1 DOT. Staked DOT is locked during bonding, with a 28-day unbonding period after unstaking. Polkadot’s design emphasizes security: as of late 2024 it expanded to 500 active validators in the set, improving decentralization. Slashing is in effect for malicious or unstable validators, incentivizing good behavior. Polkadot’s thriving ecosystem of parachains (like Moonbeam, Astar, and Acala) and cross-chain bridges underpin its long-term adoption and liquidity.

Data Table: Polkadot (DOT) Staking Data Table (NPoS, Layer-0 Network)

CategoryDetails
Current Staking APY~15% annual yield for nominators (slightly higher for validators). Inflation-funded rewards; actual APY can fluctuate with network staking rates. 🔗 Source
Network & MechanismHeterogeneous multichain (parachain) network using Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS). Holders (nominators) back professional validators. Shared security across parachains.
Security & DecentralizationHigh – ~500 active validators in NPoS set, backed by ~31k nominators. No single validator has outsized control. Slashing and Polkadot’s rigorous governance bolster security. 🔗 Messari
Lock-Up Period28 days unbonding when unstaking DOT (funds are illiquid and earn no rewards during this time). No unlocking required for routine reward payout – rewards can be claimed or compounded anytime. 🔗 Polkadot Support
Validator RequirementsNo fixed minimum stake to be a validator, but one must exceed the lowest active stake (~350 DOT currently). Technical needs include running a high-uptime Linux server or cloud instance and managing updates. 🔗 Source
Minimum Stake (Delegation)~1 DOT via nomination pools or some exchanges. Polkadot’s on-chain pools let small holders stake. Without pools, hundreds of DOT may be needed to earn rewards due to dynamic thresholds. 🔗 Source
Notable Ecosystem Use CasesParachains cover DeFi, NFTs, identity, etc. Notable examples: Moonbeam (EVM), Acala (DeFi), Parallel (money market). XCMP enables cross-chain communication. DOT demand rises with parachain bonding and staking. 🔗 Source

Cosmos (ATOM)

Cosmos is often dubbed the “Internet of Blockchains.” It is a Layer-1 network (the Cosmos Hub) designed to connect independent blockchains into an interoperable ecosystem via the IBC protocol. ATOM is the Cosmos Hub’s native token, used for staking and governance. Staking ATOM currently yields a very high ~20–25% APY, reflecting a relatively higher inflation rate and the fact that not all ATOM supply is staked. Cosmos staking is suited for medium-risk tolerance: the technology is proven (Tendermint BFT consensus) and widely used, but ATOM’s token economics are inflationary and its price historically more volatile.

Cosmos staking highlights

Cosmos uses a Delegated Proof-of-Stake mechanism on the hub – only the top ~175 validators (by stake) participate in consensus, and ATOM holders act as delegators by bonding their tokens to validators of choice. Running a validator node on Cosmos Hub requires significant stake (currently ~86k ATOM to make the 175th slot) and technical expertise. Delegators, however, can start with a minimal amount (even 1 ATOM). Staked ATOM is locked, with a 21-day unbonding period after you decide to unstake – during this time, funds cannot be transferred and do not earn rewards. Cosmos does enforce slashing for validator misbehavior (downtime or double-signing), which means delegators share the risk of minor losses if their validator fails critically. In return, delegators get the majority of the ~20% rewards (minus validator commission). The security of Cosmos Hub is strong given its long track record and a distributed validator set of 175 nodes, though some critique that the set size is capped (unlike Ethereum/Avalanche which allow thousands). On the flip side, Cosmos’s decentralization extends beyond a single chain – its SDK is used by many sovereign chains (Terra, Osmosis, Cronos, etc.), so development activity and ecosystem value aren’t confined to ATOM alone. Interoperability is Cosmos’s killer feature: IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) allows assets and data to flow between chains, and Cosmos Hub aims to provide services like a cross-chain DEX and shared security to the wider Cosmos ecosystem.

Cosmos (ATOM) Staking Data Table (Delegated PoS, Interoperable Network)

CategoryDetails
Current Staking APY~20–25% APR for ATOM delegators. This high rate is partly due to Cosmos’s inflation (up to 20% if stake participation is low), meaning real yield may be lower after inflation. Rewards adjust based on network-wide staking levels. 🔗 Source
Network & MechanismCosmos Hub – a Proof-of-Stake Layer-1 chain using Tendermint BFT consensus. Delegated PoS: ATOM holders delegate stake to validators. Cosmos also leads cross-chain innovation with IBC and upcoming Interchain Security.
Security & DecentralizationModerate–High: Cosmos Hub has ~175 active validators. While this is fewer than some chains, it’s globally distributed. Slashing (e.g. 5% for double-signing) enforces validator integrity. The broader Cosmos ecosystem is composed of many decentralized, sovereign blockchains. 🔗 Source
Lock-Up Period21-day unbonding period when unstaking ATOM. Tokens are illiquid and earn no rewards during this time. This helps defend against rapid stake withdrawals during attacks. 🔗 Reddit Source
Validator RequirementsHigh barrier: must be in top 175 by stake. This often means tens of thousands of ATOM (e.g. ~86k ATOM for the last slot). Validators must run a secure Tendermint node 24/7, apply updates, and avoid slashing penalties. 🔗 Source
Minimum Stake (Delegation)No fixed minimum – even <1 ATOM can be staked using wallets like Keplr or Cosmostation. Practically, a few ATOMs are recommended to offset transaction fees. Very accessible for small holders.
Notable Ecosystem ProjectsCosmos’s strength lies in its ecosystem. Key zones: Osmosis (DEX), Secret Network (privacy), Kava, Thorchain, Juno, Evmos. Major chains like BNB Chain and Crypto.org were built with Cosmos SDK. Interchain Security (upcoming) may allow ATOM stakers to secure new chains and earn additional rewards.

Avalanche (AVAX)

Avalanche is a high-performance Layer-1 blockchain known for its unique consensus protocol and subnet architecture. It prioritizes fast finality (transactions finalize in ~1 second) and high throughput, making it attractive for DeFi and enterprise use cases. Avalanche uses a Proof-of-Stake mechanism without slashing (if validators misbehave, they simply don’t earn rewards rather than losing stake). Staking AVAX yields roughly 7–10% APY in 2025, which is quite attractive given Avalanche’s large-cap status and strong ecosystem support. Risk tolerance should be medium here: Avalanche has a solid technical foundation and backing (it hasn’t suffered major outages or attacks), but as a newer smart contract platform, its token can be volatile and its long-term dominance isn’t guaranteed.

Avalanche staking highlights

Anyone can run an Avalanche validator by staking a minimum of 2,000 AVAX and operating a node (Avalanche has no hard cap on the number of validators – there are currently over 1,700 validators actively staking). Alternatively, users with smaller holdings can delegate their AVAX to an existing validator; the minimum to delegate is 25 AVAX. Avalanche’s staking is somewhat unique in that you choose your lock-up duration when staking: you must lock your AVAX for a period between 14 days and 1 year when you stake. You earn rewards only at the end of this period, and you cannot unstake early (so choose a duration you’re comfortable with). There is no slashing on Avalanche – if a validator has poor uptime, they just miss out on rewards for that period, but your delegated AVAX isn’t slashed. This makes delegating lower-risk compared to networks with slashing, though you still want to pick a validator with high uptime to actually receive the rewards. Avalanche’s security and decentralization are strong: with thousands of validators, its Nakamoto coefficient is high, and no single validator or small group can easily collude to attack (the consensus randomly samples validators, making consensus attacks impractical at scale). Avalanche’s ecosystem in 2025 is robust – it supports Ethereum-compatible smart contracts (C-Chain) and allows for custom Subnets where projects can launch their own blockchains secured by Avalanche’s validators. This has led to enterprise and institutional adoption (for example, in 2023 the Deloitte “Close As You Go” platform chose Avalanche for building disaster relief applications, and by 2025 even FIFA selected Avalanche to launch a dedicated blockchain for football’s Web3 initiatives). DeFi on Avalanche (with platforms like Trader Joe, Benqi, Pangolin) and emerging gaming subnets contribute to healthy demand for AVAX and good liquidity.

Avalanche (AVAX) Staking Data Table (PoS, Smart Contracts & Subnets)

CategoryDetails
Current Staking APY~6% to 10% APY depending on network usage and lock-up period. As of mid-2025, base reward is ~6.7% for a 1-year stake. Shorter terms may yield slightly less. Rewards come from fixed issuance – AVAX has a capped supply with controlled inflation. 🔗 Source
Network & MechanismMonolithic Layer-1 + Subnets. Avalanche includes 3 native chains: X-Chain, C-Chain (EVM), and P-Chain (platform). It supports independent subnets. Consensus: Avalanche’s Snowball PoS – validators sample each other to reach probabilistic consensus. No slashing; penalties are reward-based.
Security & DecentralizationHigh: Over 1,700 validators globally, each staking 2,000 AVAX. This wide validator base enhances security. Without slashing, the main risk is missed rewards, not fund loss. Avalanche tolerates up to 1/3 faulty validators. No major outages to date. 🔗 Source
Lock-Up PeriodFlexible: Choose between 14 days to 1 year. Stake duration must be defined at the start. AVAX cannot be withdrawn early. Longer periods do not increase rewards but are common for validator stability. Delegators often choose 1–3 months for liquidity. 🔗 Source
Validator RequirementsValidators: 2,000 AVAX minimum + run Avalanche node on stable, high-speed hardware (cloud or on-prem). Requires moderate technical skill (Linux server ops, updates). Delegators: only 25 AVAX + Avalanche Wallet – minimal setup. Validators need >80% uptime to earn full rewards. 🔗 Support
Minimum Stake (Delegation)25 AVAX minimum per delegation. No soft minimums – protocol-enforced. Even through exchanges/custodians, you need 25 AVAX to stake. Delegations can be split across validators. 🔗 Support
Notable Ecosystem ProjectsDeFi: Trader Joe, Pangolin, Aave, Curve. Lending: Benqi. Gaming: DeFi Kingdoms subnet, Kraken subnet. Enterprise/Institutions: FIFA World Cup fan chain, Intain’s finance subnet. Partners: Deloitte, Mastercard (blockchain accelerator). Avalanche’s subnet model fuels adoption and innovation. 🔗 Source

Solana (SOL)

Solana is a high-speed Layer-1 blockchain known for its ability to handle thousands of transactions per second with very low fees. It uses a unique combination of Proof of History (PoH) and Delegated Proof of Stake for consensus. Solana’s focus on scalability has attracted many DeFi and NFT projects, making it one of Ethereum’s notable competitors. Staking SOL yields around 6–7% APY for delegators in 2025, and is relatively straightforward to do via various wallets or exchanges. Risk level: medium-high – while Solana is a top 10 market-cap blockchain with a large community, it has experienced technical outages in the past, reflecting the challenges of its novel architecture. However, the network’s reliability has been improving and its ecosystem remains vibrant.

Solana staking highlights

In Solana’s Delegated PoS system, anyone can become a validator by running a node (there’s no protocol-specified minimum SOL requirement to be a validator, though in practice one needs enough delegated stake to earn meaningful rewards). For everyday users, staking means delegating SOL to a validator through a wallet like Phantom, Solflare, or Ledger. The minimum delegation is effectively about 0.01 SOL – essentially negligible – which lowers the barrier for small holders. When you stake SOL, your funds are locked in a stake account. Solana does not have a fixed lock-up period, but unstaking takes effect at the end of an epoch. Epochs last approximately 2-3 days, so after you trigger “unstake,” you wait until the next epoch boundary (at most ~48 hours) for your SOL to become accessible. There’s no additional lengthy unbonding beyond that. Solana currently doesn’t implement slashing for validator faults (slashing is planned but not live yet), meaning delegators won’t lose principal if their validator goes offline or misbehaves – they just won’t earn rewards for downtime. In terms of security and decentralization: Solana has ~1,400 independent validators participating, and the network’s Nakamoto coefficient (the number of validators needed to halt the network) is about 19, which is fairly decent for a newer chain. However, Solana’s high hardware requirements (high-performance servers) mean many validators are data-center hosted, which some view as a centralization risk. The Solana Foundation and community have worked to improve this by funding more distributed node hosting and a second validator client (Firedancer by Jump) to increase resilience. Notably, Solana suffered at least seven major outages between 2020 and 2022 due to software bugs and overwhelming traffic, which dented its reputation. By late 2024, these incidents became less frequent as the software matured and fee markets were introduced to manage spam Prospective SOL stakers should be aware of this history, but also note the network’s stability was significantly better in 2023–2024.

Solana (SOL) Staking Data Table (Delegated PoS with Proof of History)

CategoryDetails
Current Staking APY~7% APY for SOL delegators (after validator commission). Inflation started at ~8%, decreasing 15% per year toward ~1.5%. As of 2025, it’s ~5–6%, so real yield is modest. Rewards are paid per epoch (~2 days) and auto-compounded unless withdrawn. 🔗 Source
Network & MechanismLayer-1 smart contract chain known for high throughput. Uses Proof of Stake + Proof of History (PoH), a global timestamp mechanism that pre-orders transactions for high speed. Delegated staking model. Slashing not yet active, but planned in future to penalize bad validators. 🔗 Solana
Security & DecentralizationModerate: ~1,414 validators (late 2024), in 30+ countries. No validator holds more than 3.2% stake thanks to stake caps and Solana Foundation delegation. Tolerates up to 33% malicious stake. Though the network had past outages, recent upgrades (fee markets, new validator client) aim to improve resilience. Anyone can join as a validator – open and permissionless. 🔗 Source
Lock-Up Period~2 days (1 epoch). Unstaking starts at current epoch and completes by the end of it. Can take a few hours up to ~48 hours, depending on timing. No extra bonding period. On-chain staking may differ from liquid staking options on exchanges. 🔗 Docs
Validator RequirementsHigh-spec hardware needed: multi-core CPU, 128GB+ RAM, fast SSDs, 1 Gbps internet. No protocol-enforced minimum stake, but to earn meaningful rewards, validators usually need 5,000–10,000 SOL delegated. Solana Foundation may delegate stake to high-performing new validators.
Minimum Stake (Delegation)Technically no protocol minimum, but in practice ~0.01 SOL is needed to cover wallet fees and keep stake accounts rent-exempt. This makes Solana very accessible for small holders. 🔗 Source
Notable Ecosystem ProjectsDeFi: Serum (legacy), OpenBook, Raydium, Solend. NFTs: Magic Eden, top collections like Degenerate Apes, Solana Monkey Business, DeGods (ex). Web3 & Consumer Apps: STEPN (move-to-earn), Solana Pay, Solana Saga smartphone. Strong exchange support, high liquidity. Main challenge: avoiding future downtime and continuing decentralization – both are trending positively.

NEAR Protocol (NEAR)

NEAR Protocol is a sharded Layer-1 blockchain focused on developer and user-friendliness, sometimes described as a community-run cloud. NEAR uses a unique Thresholded Proof-of-Stake (TPoS) consensus (a form of delegated PoS) and implements dynamic sharding to scale as demand grows. Staking NEAR currently offers about 9–10% APY, making it an appealing high-yield option. However, NEAR is a smaller-cap project relative to others on this list, and its network is in a growth phase – hence it’s pegged at a higher risk level. Investors should be aware that while NEAR has strong technology and an active developer community, its token price and adoption depend on it carving out a significant niche in the competitive smart contract arena.

NEAR staking highlights

NEAR’s staking works via an auction-like mechanism each epoch. There are a limited number of validator seats (around 100 at present, potentially scaling up as shards increase). To become a validator, one must stake enough NEAR to be in the top N bidders for those seats – currently the entry threshold is on the order of ~20k–25k NEAR. Most users therefore participate as delegators, staking their NEAR to a validator pool. The minimum to delegate is very low (no fixed minimum) – even 1 NEAR can be staked via NEAR Wallet or other interfaces. When you stake NEAR, those tokens are locked; unstaking initiates a 4-epoch (~48 hour) unbonding period after which you can withdraw your NEAR. Notably, NEAR uses epochs (~12 hours each), and rewards are distributed at the end of every epoch. NEAR’s inflation rate is around 5% annually, all of which goes to stakers (minus a portion that’s burned from transaction fees), so the ~9–10% APY indicates that a significant chunk of NEAR supply is not staked (giving higher rewards to those who do stake). In terms of security, NEAR has a smaller validator set and higher centralization of stake than some peers – as of the latest analysis, NEAR had about 100 validators and the top 10 validators controlled ~35% of the stake (top 17 about 51%). This concentration is a centralization concern: a collusion of a few large validators could, in theory, censor or disrupt the network, and it also means the Nakamoto coefficient (by stake) is on the lower side. The NEAR team is aware of this and has been working to onboard more validators and lower the seat price (they have a roadmap to eventually have hundreds of validators as sharding expands). On the positive side, NEAR has had no major security incidents or downtime since launch; its codebase was professionally audited and it’s built with safety in mind (it even has a robust bridge, Rainbow Bridge, which famously thwarted multiple attack attempts). Stakers should choose validators carefully – like other networks, delegators can be slashed if a validator double-signs (though such events have not occurred on NEAR to date).

NEAR’s ecosystem and adoption

NEAR may not have the brand-name recognition of Solana or Avalanche yet, but it’s gaining traction. It emphasizes an easy developer experience (with support for Rust and AssemblyScript) and easy user experience (human-readable account names, web wallet, fiat onboarding). Aurora, NEAR’s EVM-compatible layer, allows Ethereum dApps to deploy on NEAR, expanding its DeFi ecosystem. NEAR’s DeFi includes Ref Finance (AMM DEX), Burrow (lending, similar to Compound), and Bastion, among others, often accessed via the Wallet or Aurora. NEAR also powers the popular Sweat Economy (the fitness app Sweatcoin’s crypto tokens) which brought millions of non-crypto users into holding NEAR assets. The protocol has inked partnerships with major companies – for instance, Google Cloud joined NEAR’s validator program to support the network, and
the Colombian corporate giant Grupo Nutresa piloted NEAR for supply chain tracking. These signs of enterprise interest and a $800M ecosystem fund (announced in 2021) indicate strong support for growth. Liquidity for NEAR token is decent (traded on major exchanges), but thinner than for larger alts – one reason yields remain high is to incentivize holding and staking. Overall, staking NEAR is a bet on a promising but still maturing platform.

NEAR Protocol (NEAR) Staking Data Table (Thresholded PoS, Sharded Network)

CategoryDetails
Current Staking APY~9–10% APY for NEAR delegators. Rewards come from 5% fixed annual inflation plus 30% of transaction fees (70% burned). APY adjusts dynamically — more stakers mean lower yield. 🔗 Source
Network & MechanismLayer-1 sharded blockchain focused on usability. Uses Thresholded Proof-of-Stake (TPoS) – an auction selects validators each epoch. It’s a delegated PoS model. Currently running Phase 0 of sharding, with gradual rollout via Nightshade. Finality in a few seconds using BFT consensus. 🔗 Source
Security & DecentralizationModerate to low decentralization: ~100 active validators. Top 10 hold >35% of stake. The NEAR team acknowledges this and aims to expand the validator set. Despite the concentration, validators are globally distributed. Security track record is strong – Rainbow Bridge stopped a 2022 attack automatically. 🔗 Source
Lock-Up Period~48 hours to unstake. Requires 4 epochs (~12 hours each). No rewards during unbonding. You can re-stake during that time to cancel. Short lock period compared to most PoS chains. 🔗 Source
Validator RequirementsMust earn a seat by surpassing the 100th highest stake (usually ~20k+ NEAR). Validators need multi-core CPU, 32GB+ RAM, SSD, solid uptime. Downtime doesn’t slash funds but causes reward and seat loss. Slashing exists for double-signing, though hasn’t occurred yet. 🔗 Source
Minimum Stake (Delegation)No strict minimum – even fractions of 1 NEAR are stakeable via NEAR Wallet. ~0.1 NEAR is recommended for gas. Encourages broad access, though extremely small stakes may yield negligible rewards.
Notable Ecosystem ProjectsDApps: Mintbase, Paras, Near Social. EVM compatibility: Aurora with Trisolaris, Bastion. Gaming/Metaverse: Sweat Economy (from Sweatcoin). DAOs: Sputnik DAO. Support: Google Cloud runs nodes; NEAR chosen for UNESCO blockchain ed. Strong VC/foundation backing. Smaller than Solana/Polygon, but growing steadily – higher-risk, higher-reward opportunity. 🔗 Source

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Please conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Feel free to "borrow" this article — just don’t forget to link back to the original.

Dean J. Driessen

Dean J. Driessen

Editor-in-Chief / Coin Push Dean is a crypto enthusiast based in Amsterdam, where he follows every twist and turn in the world of cryptocurrencies and Web3.

What does the Tornado Cash ruling mean for crypto developers?

The federal court ruling barring Tornado Cash sanctions discussion in Roman Storm's trial establishes a crucial precedent for developer liability. By limiting arguments about OFAC's sanction authority, the decision implicitly challenges regulators' tendency to treat...

Latest News

Sandbox Proposes Metaversity Campus for Education

The Sandbox DAO is considering a groundbreaking proposal to establish a Metaversity Campus, an educational hub within its virtual ecosystem. SIP-33, spearheaded by community admin Geraldine, aims to create an interactive learning environment where users can develop...

Bitcoin Unmoved by Tariffs, PNUT Soars After Musk Comments

Cryptocurrency markets showed divergent reactions to macroeconomic and social media influences Wednesday, with Bitcoin demonstrating remarkable stability amid new tariff announcements while lesser-known token PNUT surged following critical comments by Elon Musk. The...

GameSquare Unveils $100M Ethereum Strategy

GameSquare Holdings has announced a $100 million Ethereum treasury strategy targeting 8–14% yields, significantly outperforming traditional ETH staking returns. The Nasdaq-listed gaming company will deploy capital through Dialectic's Medici platform, leveraging...

Polygon Heimdall v2 Upgrade Targets 5-Second Finality

Polygon's Heimdall v2 upgrade is scheduled for July 10, 2025, marking the network's most significant technical overhaul since its 2020 launch. The migration aims to reduce transaction finality to approximately 5 seconds while addressing accumulated technical debt....

Band Protocol v3 Launches on Mainnet: New Era for Data

Band Protocol has officially launched its highly anticipated Oracle v3 on the mainnet, marking a transformative advancement in decentralized data infrastructure. This release follows extensive testing phases and represents a significant upgrade in scalability,...

CoW DAO Member Proposes Token Buyback Initiative

A new proposal by forum member peper99 suggests implementing a token buyback program for the COW token within the CoW Protocol ecosystem. This initiative emerges amid broader discussions about tokenomics optimization across decentralized autonomous organizations.The...

Latest Market Insights

What’s the Difference Between a Cold Wallet and a Crypto Exchange?

Cryptocurrency is becoming more mainstream every year, but when it comes to storing your digital assets, there’s still confusion between two of the most common options: crypto exchanges and cold wallets. If you’ve ever wondered which is right for you, this guide...

Top 10 Stablecoins of 2025: An In-Depth Report

Stablecoins have become a cornerstone of the crypto ecosystem, providing a refuge from volatility by pegging their value to stable assets (usually fiat currencies like USD). The total stablecoin market has exploded in size – rising from about $20 billion in 2020 to...

Crypto Token Launches in June 2025

June 2025 is set to be a bustling month for new crypto token launches. A diverse array of projects – spanning decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming and metaverse platforms, real-world asset tokenization, AI-driven services, and even wearable technology – are all...

Quantum Computers vs Cryptocurrencies: What is the Risk?

Quantum computers represent a fundamentally different computing paradigm compared to classical computers, leveraging principles like superposition and entanglement through the use of qubits. Unlike classical bits that are either 0 or 1, qubits can exist in multiple...

Bitcoin Dominance Soars: When Does Altseason Begin?

Bitcoin’s market dominance – the percentage of total crypto market capitalization held by Bitcoin – has been on a steep rise, reaching levels not seen in years. As of early 2025, Bitcoin accounts for well over 60% of the entire cryptocurrency market’s value, a...

AI Tokens in 2025: In-depth Report

This report provides an investment-focused analysis of 10 notable AI tokens as of 2025. We will examine their performance trends, market capitalizations, adoption levels, and real-world use cases, and discuss current investment sentiment and future outlook based on...

FOMC May 2025 Decision: Impact on the Crypto Market

As markets anticipate the Federal Open Market Committee’s May 7, 2025 decision, most analysts see the Fed holding rates at 4.25%–4.5% to assess the impact of recent tariff changes and labor data. In the crypto sector, this cautious stance has already sparked optimism,...

Table of contents

Install Coin Push QR Code
Coin Push Crypto Signals

Get live crypto breakout alerts

Install Coin Push - Stay ahead!

Scan this code or visit coinpush.app on your phone